We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.
This includes personalizing content and advertising.
By pressing "Accept All" or closing out of this banner, you consent to the use of all cookies and similar technologies and the sharing of information they collect with third parties.
You can reject marketing cookies by pressing "Deny Optional," but we still use essential, performance, and functional cookies.
In addition, whether you "Accept All," Deny Optional," click the X or otherwise continue to use the site, you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, revised from time to time.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
Blue Dolphin Shares Sink as Q3 Loss Widens, Debt & ARO Costs Mount
Read MoreHide Full Article
Since it reported third-quarter 2025 earnings, shares of Blue Dolphin Energy Company (BDCO - Free Report) have declined 35.9% compared with the S&P 500’s 3.9% decrease. Over the past month, the stock has dropped 13.6%, lagging the S&P 500’s 2% decline.
Earnings & Revenue Performance
Blue Dolphin’s third-quarter results reflected a mix of modest operating improvements and persistent bottom-line pressure. Revenue from operations fell to $70.4 million from $82.1 million a year earlier, an approximately 14% decrease as product sales softened. The company reported a net loss of $4.7 million compared with a $5 million loss in the prior-year period, while loss per share narrowed slightly to 31 cents from 34 cents. Gross profit improved from a deficit of $3.3 million to a marginal profit of $32,000, aided by more favorable refining margins. However, cost pressures and an impairment charge continued to weigh on results.
Blue Dolphin Energy Co. Price, Consensus and EPS Surprise
Operating indicators showed varied performance. Total cost of goods sold decreased to $70.3 million from $85.4 million, primarily due to lower crude and chemical costs, which declined more than $17 million year over year. The overall cost of operations rose due to a $3.0 million impairment of fixed assets related to adjustments in asset retirement obligations. General and administrative expenses increased to $1.6 million from $1 million in the prior-year quarter, reflecting higher personnel-related and administrative costs.
Refinery operations continued to represent the bulk of company activity, contributing $69.6 million of total segment revenue. Loss before income taxes in the refinery segment narrowed substantially to $2 million from $5.7 million a year earlier, a sign of improved operating efficiency. Tolling and terminaling revenue declined slightly to $1.5 million from $1.8 million, though the segment remained profitable, generating $0.5 million in income before taxes.
Management Commentary
Management emphasized incremental operational gains despite ongoing challenges in crude pricing, demand variability and working-capital constraints. CEO Jonathan Carroll highlighted improved gross profit for the nine months and the company’s ability to “extract operational efficiencies where possible and manage costs,” noting full-year consolidated EBITDA of $0.8 million through Sept. 30, 2025, up from $0.5 million in the comparable 2024 period. Nonetheless, the company acknowledged margin pressures in jet fuel and naphtha markets, periods of low refining margins and ongoing limitations on customers exporting to Mexico.
Factors Influencing the Headline Numbers
Impairment and ARO Adjustments: The $3 million impairment recorded in the quarter stemmed from a revised estimate of decommissioning obligations for pipeline and offshore platform assets. Updated project assessments indicated significantly higher estimated costs, which required a corresponding increase in the ARO liability.
Inventory Dynamics: Inventory levels remained elevated at $33.9 million, down modestly from year-end but still high due to unfavorable product pricing, reduced export opportunities and an intentional buildup during periods of low refining margins. This contributed to working-capital strain, as the company ended the quarter with a working-capital deficit of $23.1 million.
Debt-related Pressures: Multiple loan facilities remained in default at quarter-end, including two term loans with Veritex and the NPS term loan with GNCU. While lenders had not accelerated the debt as of the filing date, management acknowledged the risk of potential forced repayment and the need for additional waivers or restructuring. Interest expense totaled $0.8 million for the quarter, down from $1.5 million a year earlier, partly due to reduced balances and lower related-party interest charges.
View
The company identified key variables expected to influence results, including commodity pricing for light crude, jet fuel and naphtha; macroeconomic uncertainties involving inflation, tariffs and interest rates; and supply-chain dynamics. The company noted that future performance remains difficult to project, given margin volatility and its ongoing working-capital challenges.
Other Developments
Regulatory matters continued to represent a significant operational issue. Blue Dolphin’s BDPL subsidiary faced ongoing civil penalties from the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) related to offshore platform and pipeline decommissioning obligations. As of Sept. 30, 2025, the company accrued $2.7 million associated with two open civil penalty cases, with additional penalties expected until the violations are resolved. The company also remains subject to potential supplemental pipeline bond requirements from BOEM, which could materially affect liquidity if enforced.
Overall, while Blue Dolphin made progress in narrowing quarterly losses and improving refining margins, significant structural challenges—including regulatory liabilities, debt defaults and working-capital deficits—remain central to the company’s risk profile as it moves through year-end.
See More Zacks Research for These Tickers
Normally $25 each - click below to receive one report FREE:
Image: Bigstock
Blue Dolphin Shares Sink as Q3 Loss Widens, Debt & ARO Costs Mount
Since it reported third-quarter 2025 earnings, shares of Blue Dolphin Energy Company (BDCO - Free Report) have declined 35.9% compared with the S&P 500’s 3.9% decrease. Over the past month, the stock has dropped 13.6%, lagging the S&P 500’s 2% decline.
Earnings & Revenue Performance
Blue Dolphin’s third-quarter results reflected a mix of modest operating improvements and persistent bottom-line pressure. Revenue from operations fell to $70.4 million from $82.1 million a year earlier, an approximately 14% decrease as product sales softened. The company reported a net loss of $4.7 million compared with a $5 million loss in the prior-year period, while loss per share narrowed slightly to 31 cents from 34 cents. Gross profit improved from a deficit of $3.3 million to a marginal profit of $32,000, aided by more favorable refining margins. However, cost pressures and an impairment charge continued to weigh on results.
Blue Dolphin Energy Co. Price, Consensus and EPS Surprise
Blue Dolphin Energy Co. price-consensus-eps-surprise-chart | Blue Dolphin Energy Co. Quote
Other Key Business Metrics
Operating indicators showed varied performance. Total cost of goods sold decreased to $70.3 million from $85.4 million, primarily due to lower crude and chemical costs, which declined more than $17 million year over year. The overall cost of operations rose due to a $3.0 million impairment of fixed assets related to adjustments in asset retirement obligations. General and administrative expenses increased to $1.6 million from $1 million in the prior-year quarter, reflecting higher personnel-related and administrative costs.
Refinery operations continued to represent the bulk of company activity, contributing $69.6 million of total segment revenue. Loss before income taxes in the refinery segment narrowed substantially to $2 million from $5.7 million a year earlier, a sign of improved operating efficiency. Tolling and terminaling revenue declined slightly to $1.5 million from $1.8 million, though the segment remained profitable, generating $0.5 million in income before taxes.
Management Commentary
Management emphasized incremental operational gains despite ongoing challenges in crude pricing, demand variability and working-capital constraints. CEO Jonathan Carroll highlighted improved gross profit for the nine months and the company’s ability to “extract operational efficiencies where possible and manage costs,” noting full-year consolidated EBITDA of $0.8 million through Sept. 30, 2025, up from $0.5 million in the comparable 2024 period. Nonetheless, the company acknowledged margin pressures in jet fuel and naphtha markets, periods of low refining margins and ongoing limitations on customers exporting to Mexico.
Factors Influencing the Headline Numbers
Impairment and ARO Adjustments: The $3 million impairment recorded in the quarter stemmed from a revised estimate of decommissioning obligations for pipeline and offshore platform assets. Updated project assessments indicated significantly higher estimated costs, which required a corresponding increase in the ARO liability.
Inventory Dynamics: Inventory levels remained elevated at $33.9 million, down modestly from year-end but still high due to unfavorable product pricing, reduced export opportunities and an intentional buildup during periods of low refining margins. This contributed to working-capital strain, as the company ended the quarter with a working-capital deficit of $23.1 million.
Debt-related Pressures: Multiple loan facilities remained in default at quarter-end, including two term loans with Veritex and the NPS term loan with GNCU. While lenders had not accelerated the debt as of the filing date, management acknowledged the risk of potential forced repayment and the need for additional waivers or restructuring. Interest expense totaled $0.8 million for the quarter, down from $1.5 million a year earlier, partly due to reduced balances and lower related-party interest charges.
View
The company identified key variables expected to influence results, including commodity pricing for light crude, jet fuel and naphtha; macroeconomic uncertainties involving inflation, tariffs and interest rates; and supply-chain dynamics. The company noted that future performance remains difficult to project, given margin volatility and its ongoing working-capital challenges.
Other Developments
Regulatory matters continued to represent a significant operational issue. Blue Dolphin’s BDPL subsidiary faced ongoing civil penalties from the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) related to offshore platform and pipeline decommissioning obligations. As of Sept. 30, 2025, the company accrued $2.7 million associated with two open civil penalty cases, with additional penalties expected until the violations are resolved. The company also remains subject to potential supplemental pipeline bond requirements from BOEM, which could materially affect liquidity if enforced.
Overall, while Blue Dolphin made progress in narrowing quarterly losses and improving refining margins, significant structural challenges—including regulatory liabilities, debt defaults and working-capital deficits—remain central to the company’s risk profile as it moves through year-end.